Tag Archives: Facebook

Donald J. Trump for President- A Few Articles and Social Media Links

donald-trump-for-president-2016-make-americaSince declaring his candidacy for President, Donald J. Trump has become well-known as a savvy promoter of his campaign through the media (television, radio, cable news, etc.). Because of this, over the months Trump has generated tons of free publicity for himself, though sometimes controversial and negative, yet he’s continually been in the news cycle. He’s also a quite the master on social media, where he is a dominant, far-reaching presence. Perhaps best known for his command of Twitter, Trump has generated currently over 33,000 Tweets and has 11.6 million followers.  And a Google search for Donald Trump currently yields 381,000,000 results!

If Google search results and social media presence are an indicator of a candidate’s popularity/momentum, things look good for Mr. Trump.  Hillary Clinton has a solid social media presence as well, but Trump clobbers her in # of Google search entries, and in number of Twitter and Facebook followers.  She does however have a LinkedIn presence, whereas he has none.

Interestingly, I wasn’t able to find via Google search a collected list of links to his various social media platforms.  So as a service to anyone who might be searching for this, please find below a handy list of links to Donald Trump’s social media presence on the web (specifically, these are mostly sites related to him as a candidate for President in 2016).

Oh, by the way, don’t forget to vote for Trump/Pence in November, and make America great again!  Here’s some of my posts on the upcoming election and issues at stake (I’ll be posting more soon):

Presidential Election 2016: What this Election is Really About

To the NeverTrumpers

The Tyranny of the Offended

It’s Not Islamophobia, It’s Common Sense

Give us a break, Hillary- Mishandling Classified Information isn’t just a “Mistake”

Hillary/Obama Logic vs. Real Logic

 

And here without further adieu, are the Donald J. Trump social media links: 

Make America Great Again! | Donald J Trump for President

Donald Trump Facebook Page

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump #TrumpPence16

Donald J. Trump for President YouTube Channel

realdonaldtrump Instagram Account

Donald Trump Wikipedia entry

Donald Trump Reddit Account

Donald Trump pins on Pinterest

Donald J. Trump Google+ Page

Diamond and Silk

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Election 2016, Social Media

Theological Debates on Facebook- Are They Profitable?

I’d like to ask a question—can profitable discussion on a theological issue actually happen on Facebook?

I had an experience recently where someone took offense because they felt I was commenting too much on their theologically oriented wall post.  But the determination of “too much” was based on his purely subjective notion of how much commenting on his post was appropriate.  Now I’ll admit — after he posted a critique of a theological “meme” (i.e., statement) I was quite dogged in asking him to provide the reasoning behind his several assertions about it.   He declined to do so, which of course, is his prerogative.  On the other hand, it was also my prerogative to continue to comment and engage with others in the discussion, which is what I did.  But this seemed to disturb him.

I chose to comment on this particular post because it touched on God’s sovereignty, a theological issue I think extremely important and practical for believers. In declining to respond to my request for explanation of his argument, one reason he gave is that Facebook is not a conducive forum (for intelligent debate).

Well,  in one sense he may be right.  The Facebook feed comes at you with many random streams of data.  Perhaps for many of us the experience of being in FB is like watching TV while flipping through channels– one is just looking for passive, mindless entertainment.  Yet we can choose to focus our attention, can’t we, even while in Facebook?

Now it’s true Facebook discussions can be utterly worthless and a waste of time when the participants simply talk past one another.  We see this all the time.  But, especially among Christians talking theology, I don’t see why civil, gracious, intelligent, even fruitful discussion may not occur, if we actually take time to hear one another out and respectfully present our arguments.   Of course, because Christians are sinful human beings, discussion may devolve from noble passion to fleshly, ignoble heat.  Yet as long as folks refrain from personal attacks, imputation of bad motives, and maintain focus on the issues at hand,  giving each other some grace, I think discussions can stay on track.  We may even learn from them.

I have been involved in debates both good and bad.  In bad ones (and for me these seem to occur more often on Facebook) folks seem impatient with the process of discussion/argument itself– thus they neglect thoughtful responses and are very reactive (I’ve been guilty of this myself, as I’m sure many of us have).   Also it seems some want to state their opinion just as a soundbite (perhaps related to the ephemeral nature of Facebook?), but are not  prepared (nor seemingly interested) to defend their view/opinion against possible objections.

I’ve also participated in more interesting and productive online theological “debates” (over at the Theologica forum, for example).  I believe the difference between good and bad theological discussions relates in part to whether participants are confident enough in their own position to open the floor to debate and allow various sides to present their respective cases.  Sure, maybe 9 times out of 10, such debates end with folks remaining firmly convinced of the truth of their own original position, but at least those participating and/or “listening in” can examine the reasoning and arguments of all the positions and form their own conclusions.  In this way, I think such dialogue may be beneficial. Also, when one has to defend one’s position, it challenges you to think more deeply on it, if only to be able to articulate the reasons for one’s stand and to answer objections.  This can surely sharpen one’s thinking.  Debate isn’t necessarily bad (as some tend to think); if handled well, it can be educational, even edifying.  Though not necessarily easy, I think fruitful theological debate is do-able.  It’s a shame we don’t often achieve it.

Going back to my recent experience, again I own up to the fact that I was very insistent on continuing the discussion even after the originator of the post said he did not want to engage further with me.  I was so eager to make a persuasive case that Gods’ sovereignty is a crucial, foundational and practical truth in the believer’s life, one that can help us even as we try to make sense of all the bad and evil things that happen in a fallen world.   So I pressed on in the discussion, with the thought I would interact with others who were also commenting.  Was continuing like this a breach of commenting etiquette?  I don’t know.  But I would also ask, if one is not interested in the give and take required for a theological dialogue to be productive and/or educational, then why initiate a discussion in a public forum?

Thoughts?

Leave a comment

Filed under Controversy, Theology, Web & Tech