The recent conference by John MacArthur, “Strange Fire” has generated a lot of controversy. It stirs up an ongoing and often heated debate among evangelical Christians on “cessationism vs continuationism”: did miraculous gifts such as tongues, miracles and prophecy “cease” some time after the establishment of the early church and with the canonization of Scripture? Or are those gifts continuing in operation, and to be sought after and put into practice today? Unfortunately lack of clarity about terms such as cessationism, continuationism and charismaticism creates confusion as people debate these issues. Online debates I have been part of often suffer from the lack of clarity. Since there are varied positions within cessationism and charismaticism, to call oneself a “cessationist” or “continuationist” or a “charismatic” isn’t enough and usually requires further clarification. Exactly what kind of “cessationist” or “charismatic” are you? Lisa Robinson has a post right now that addresses this topic, “What is a Cessationist?…or Why I think We Need Another Term“, and I think her post is a helpful conversation opener on this.
Yet I think that what underlies the need for clarity of these terms is something even more fundamental and urgent to our mission as Christians: what is the gospel? In other words, it seems the believer needs to figure out if charismatics are right or cessationists correct, because these very different positions have such a great impact on our mission of making disciples, and also lead to very practical differences in following Christ. I encountered a Facebook post about continuationist Mark Driscoll showing up at the John MacArthur conference. I noticed that several people sympathetic to the continuationist position in their comments on the post were bashing cessationism and Reformed theology with statements I felt were very derogatory as well as inaccurate characterizations of it. Now perhaps many in the charismatic community who know of the Strange Fire conference feel the same way– that the conference unfairly caricatures the charismatic position. One of the commenters on the post made this statement:
I am just learning about all of this and still reading. but it sounds to me like two “camps” with different ideas of how the holy spirit should look. they spend all their energy and time on defending “their” way instead of using that time and energy on preaching the gospel to a dying world. seems like they are missing the whole point.
I think the commenter makes a salient point, one that I can sympathize with. It’s true that believers can be too focused on internal squabbles and get distracted from their main task, which as we know is to preach the gospel and make disciples. But while we must not pick a fight on every little matter, there are matters too important to our mission to not get right. In my mind there is no more important issue than getting the gospel right. What exactly did Christ accomplish for us on the cross? What should the Christian life look like? Is the believer still a sinner, or a saint who sins? Must we have all these answers precisely correct before we go out and make disciples? I am not going to attempt in the brief post to answer all of these questions (but perhaps I’ll address them in future posts).
Yet I do believe it is part of the task of preaching the gospel message to be able to give accurate and Scriptural answers to these basic, critically important questions. How can we preach a saving message if the gospel we preach is not real or true or accurate? The Church is even charged with correcting false teachers/teaching. How can we do so if we don’t know what the true gospel is? We’re in the midst of a raging spiritual battle in which the forces of darkness are quite happy if the message we preach is a distortion that leads people away from the true and living God, all the while deceiving them into thinking that Christ is being truly preached. We have been warned by Christ Himself that false Christs will come (Matt 24:24), and that in the last day many who thought they were working in the name of Jesus will find that Jesus rejects not only their works but them as well (Matt 7:21-23). This is a very sobering warning. Time is short, and there are eternal stakes involved if we allow ourselves to be deceived.
In my opinion the popular charismatic message has got things very wrong. It declares that all the miraculous gifts that were part of the early church continue today in the same exact manner as in the early church and are even crucial to the life and mission of the church. Every believer should be a miracle worker, a prophet, a tongues speaker and a healer, or at least be ardently seeking these available gifts. The Strange Fire conference looks at the phenomena happening in much of the charismatic world under the lens of Scripture, and finds it unbiblical. The miracles they claim are happening cannot be verified, the prophecies proclaimed are usually wrong, the tongues are not practiced in accordance with Scriptural guidelines and don’t appear to be real languages, but only gibberish. Accordingly Phil Johnson charges, it commits “the sin of attributing to the Holy Spirit words He has not spoken and things He has not done.” Now John MacArthur and Phil Johnson are well aware that there are charismatics who are well-studied, who teach an orthodox view of Scripture, who are not at all guilty of the excesses often found in the movement. In fact there are even well-known “Reformed Continuationists” like John Piper, Wayne Grudem and others that they esteem very highly for their ministries of the Word. Nevertheless, these reformed continuationist leaders who are aware of the “strange” phenomena seem very reluctant and reticent about criticizing these aberrant practices. Over at the Cripplegate blog, Mike Ricardi has posted Phil Johnson’s outstanding message, Strange Fire – Is There a Baby in the Bathwater? and I think Phil really hits the nail on the head when he writes:
But there’s this carefully cultivated, non-committal spirit of indecision that permeates most of the Reformed charismatic and “open-but-cautious” segments of the evangelical community. It is a deliberate agnosticism with regard to discerning spirits.
So the extremists and the charlatans can make any claim or pull any stunt they like with near impunity. The handful of Charismatics who have the most influence in conservative evangelical circles have basically settled into a comfortable indifference. (Remember the line I quoted from Michael Brown earlier? “Why [should] Pentecostal and charismatic pastors renounce extremes in their movement?”) Supposedly “cautious” continuationists watch the procession of charismatic horseplay. They are curious, intrigued, generally nonplussed, but they refuse to make any judgment until after the wheels come totally off the latest bandwagon.
It someone looks into the turbid swamp of charismatic sludge, and thinks that attitude of non-judgmental passivity is the baby, forget it. That kind of smug, deliberate indecision has more in common with double-mindedness than with faith. There are times when staking out a middle position is simply the wrong thing to do. And it is never more wrong than when thousands of people are going around claiming to speak for God but prophesying falsely.
It is time to get the gospel right. We have been blessed and equipped to complete our mission with the authority and power of the Word of God, “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work (2 Tim 3:16-17).” Why then do we need to seek after sensational experiences, prophecies, miracles, tongues, especially if, when we stop kidding ourselves and admit the truth, we can see that the things we are seeking after are not authentic? How does inaccurate, hit-or-miss prophecy help anyone? How does if further the cause of Christ to claim that healing and miracles are happening when in fact they are not happening?
Does what I am saying deny the power of God? No, because I am not saying that God will not answer prayer for healing, even in miraculous fashion, nor am I saying that God may not visit us with extraordinary things whenever He wants. But my charge is not to seek after the extraordinary but to humbly live for Christ. I seek His power not that I may have ecstatic experiences or by miracle doing prove to an unbelieving world that the God I worship is real, but that I may live faithfully and honor Him in the way I speak and act and live. The gospel itself is the power of God, and it accomplishes the miracle of raising the dead to life, and we have the privilege of being part of that.
For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek (Romans 1:16)
3 responses to “It’s Time to Get the Gospel Right”
i honestly believe, we, the different denominations have different definition of the gospel or what the gospel is. there lies the problem.
maybe we are up to the same dilemma during Jesus time “who do you say I am?” or our time “what is the gospel?”
diverse and unique we are, i think it all boils down to our understanding of the gospel.
i see missionaries in my country. not preaching the gospel with mouth, but with actions. while i see on the television a charismatic preacher, preaching the gospel not with actions, but with words.
its the gospel that ultimately defines us. why is it that when you meet a total stranger yet you felt as if you know the person very well? strangely you learn them to be gospel preachers.
i must admit, im not that a fan of McArthur. but i have heard John Pipers “what is the gospel?”. it was a very simple definition. nothing fancy. not that i am a john piper fan, i am not. but the simplicity of the gospel is what makes it too good to be true which is too good not to be true 🙂
The best comment I have seen on the conference is by Sean McIntyre on Challies’ post, “Strange Fire Conference: Preachers of Witch Doctors?” He says, “the problem is not charismatic theology but syncretism and This is not confined to any one church as anyone who has lived in Africa knows.” He mentions the error of “talking the talk but not walking the walk” seen in African Calvinist churches, and I would say that these problems (syncretism, phariseeism/sanctimony) are rampant everywhere.
Pingback: It’s Time to Get the Gospel Right | Not Unto Us